Can triangulation be used in mixed methods research?
Frequently asked questions about triangulation
It’s a research strategy that can help you enhance the validity and credibility of your findings. Triangulation is mainly used in qualitative research, but it’s also commonly applied in quantitative research. Mixed methods research always uses triangulation.
What is triangulation in mixed method?
Triangulation is an analysis technique used in multi-method research designs. Many research projects utilize more than one data collection method, leading to the development of different datasets. Datasets might be those collected from a quantitative survey or participant observation, for example.
Why use triangulation and mixed methods in qualitative research?
Both are mainly recognized for combining more than one methodological approach in a study. Mixed methods are focused on combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Triangulation is broader in the kinds of methods that are combined. It is often used as a combination of several qualitative methods.
Is mixed method and triangulation is same?
Mixed method is a type of multi-method study. Triangulation, just like a triangle shape, is used by researchers to bring together the findings from various data sources or methods used for a research inquiry. Triangulation can be used to enhance the confirmability of research findings.
What are the 4 types of triangulation?
In 1978, Norman Denzin identified four basic types of triangulation: (1) data triangulation: the use of multiple data sources in a single study; (2) investigator triangulation: the use of multiple investigators/research- ers to study a particular phenomenon; (3) theory triangulation: the use of multiple perspectives to …
How do you triangulate qualitative research?
In order to triangulate, each different evaluator would study the program using the same qualitative method (interview, observation, case study, or focus groups). The findings from each evaluator would be compared.
What is triangulation in qualitative research?
Triangulation refers to the use of multiple methods or data sources in qualitative research to develop a comprehensive understanding of phenomena (Patton, 1999). Triangulation also has been viewed as a qualitative research strategy to test validity through the convergence of information from different sources.
Can triangulation be used in qualitative research?
What is triangulation in qualitative research examples?
Theory triangulation
Theory triangulation involves using multiple theoretical models to study a particular phenomenon or issue. For example, a researcher may use two different psychological theories to explain the same phenomenon, such as competitive and cooperative behavior in dogs.
Is triangulation qualitative or quantitative?
The triangulation combines qualitative and quantitative methods and complements those results to a comprehensive picture of the phenomenon under study. The approach has been used in some health studies, but has only scarcely been applied in demographic research.
What is an example of triangulation?
Examples. If a parent refuses to acknowledge their children’s personality and individualism, and at the same time, siblings are treated very differently and discouraged from communicating with one another except through the parent, it’s triangulation.
What is an example of triangulation in qualitative research?
Theory triangulation involves using multiple theoretical models to study a particular phenomenon or issue. For example, a researcher may use two different psychological theories to explain the same phenomenon, such as competitive and cooperative behavior in dogs.
Which is the best example of triangulation in data gathering?
Answer» d. Collecting data from users in different ways with different methods.
How do you triangulate data in qualitative research?
Data triangulation involves the use of different sources of data/information. A key strategy is to categorize each group or type of stakeholder for the program that you are evaluating. Then, be certain to include a comparable number of people from each stakeholder group in the evaluation study.